Creek vs Chinese Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Creek
Chinese
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Creek
Chinese
21.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Chinese Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,656,713 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 21.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,708,230 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.283 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 81.5%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Chinese |
| Minimum | 4.2% | 0.70% |
| Maximum | 75.0% | 58.3% |
| Range | 70.8% | 57.6% |
| Mean | 28.7% | 14.1% |
| Median | 25.2% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.0% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.5% | 17.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.5% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.5% | 11.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 11.8% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Seminole (21.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Bahamian (21.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.6%, a difference of 0.19%), British West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Ute (21.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (11.7%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 3.3%), Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 4.9%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and Immigrants from Iran (12.5%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |