Brazilian vs Chinese Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Brazilian
Chinese
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Brazilians
Chinese
15.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
81.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Chinese Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 319,230,692 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182 and weighted average of 15.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,708,230 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.283 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 32.9%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Brazilian | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.9% | 0.70% |
Maximum | 41.6% | 58.3% |
Range | 39.6% | 57.6% |
Mean | 16.2% | 14.1% |
Median | 14.9% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.9% | 17.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 11.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 11.8% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Brazilians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Slovak (15.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Jordan (15.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Venezuelan (15.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Puget Sound Salish (15.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and New Zealander (15.7%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Slavs | 84.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 84.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 83.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 83.5 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.7% |
Samoans | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.7% |
New Zealanders | 82.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Venezuelans | 82.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Brazilians | 81.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.8% |
Slovaks | 80.3 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.2 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.8 /100 | #151 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 79.5 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
French | 78.7 /100 | #153 | Good 15.8% |
Syrians | 77.5 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
French Canadians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (11.7%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 3.3%), Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 4.9%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and Immigrants from Iran (12.5%, a difference of 5.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |