Creek vs Scottish Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Creek
Scottish
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Creek
Scottish
21.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
93.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Scottish Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,656,713 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 21.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 546,371,305 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.785 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 41.2%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Scottish |
Minimum | 4.2% | 5.0% |
Maximum | 75.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 70.8% | 95.0% |
Mean | 28.7% | 37.8% |
Median | 25.2% | 24.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.0% | 16.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.5% | 55.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.5% | 39.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.5% | 29.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 29.0% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Seminole (21.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Bahamian (21.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.6%, a difference of 0.19%), British West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Ute (21.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.7% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.7% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are South African (15.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Belgian (15.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Native Hawaiian (15.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (15.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Armenians | 93.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 93.5 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.2% |
South Africans | 93.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Scottish | 93.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 92.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Canadians | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |