Cree vs Salvadoran Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cree
Salvadoran
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Cree
Salvadorans
15.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cree vs Salvadoran Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,205,859 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cree and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,655,447 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 1.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cree | Salvadoran |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 46.1% | 50.9% |
| Range | 44.3% | 49.7% |
| Mean | 18.3% | 15.9% |
| Median | 15.5% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.2% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.7% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.6% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Cree and Salvadorans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cree are French American Indian (15.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Armenia (15.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Laos (15.0%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (15.2%, a difference of 0.78%), and Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.84%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
| French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |