Potawatomi vs Salvadoran Female Poverty
COMPARE
Potawatomi
Salvadoran
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Potawatomi
Salvadorans
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
247th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Potawatomi vs Salvadoran Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,742,920 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,655,447 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 0.14%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Potawatomi | Salvadoran |
| Minimum | 3.1% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 63.6% | 50.9% |
| Range | 60.6% | 49.7% |
| Mean | 20.2% | 15.9% |
| Median | 17.8% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.7% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.2% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.5% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.2% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Potawatomi and Salvadorans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (15.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |