Bhutanese vs Ute Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Ute
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Bhutanese
Ute
11.4%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.9%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Ute Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,147,907 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.138 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,501,714 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 17.9%, a difference of 56.1%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Ute |
Minimum | 1.8% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 33.8% | 70.6% |
Range | 31.9% | 64.1% |
Mean | 11.5% | 32.1% |
Median | 9.9% | 23.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 48.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 30.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 19.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 19.2% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Tongan (11.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Maltese (11.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Bolivian (11.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Asian (11.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Greece (11.5%, a difference of 0.45%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Asians | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ute by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Menominee (18.0%, a difference of 0.55%), Arapaho (17.8%, a difference of 0.60%), Chippewa (18.0%, a difference of 0.81%), Choctaw (18.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Dominican (17.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.5% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.6% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.8% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.0% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.1% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.2% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 18.3% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 18.4% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 18.5% |