Czech vs Sudanese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
COMPARE
Czech
Sudanese
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Comparison
Czechs
Sudanese
10.5%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.8%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75
83.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Sudanese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,172,256 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.307 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,744,801 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.603 and weighted average of 11.8%, a difference of 11.7%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Sudanese |
| Minimum | 3.7% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 66.7% | 56.4% |
| Range | 63.0% | 55.2% |
| Mean | 15.5% | 13.4% |
| Median | 12.3% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.9% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.5% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.5% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Scotland (10.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Slovene (10.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Welsh (10.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Slovak (10.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Dutch (10.5%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
| Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Scottish | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Slovaks | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Welsh | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Czechs | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Poles | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Menominee | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Fijian (11.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Pennsylvania German (11.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Pakistani (11.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Italy (11.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and Malaysian (11.8%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 85.5 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 84.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Malaysians | 84.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 84.0 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Fijians | 83.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.6 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 83.4 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 82.6 /100 | #127 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 81.7 /100 | #128 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Ethiopians | 80.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Spanish | 80.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 79.6 /100 | #131 | Good 11.9% |
| Lebanese | 78.3 /100 | #132 | Good 11.9% |