Chickasaw vs Iraqi Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Iraqi
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Comparison
Chickasaw
Iraqis
11.6%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75
86.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Iraqi Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,762,079 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,010,208 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iraqis and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 0.80%.

Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Iraqi |
Minimum | 1.7% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 40.0% | 26.4% |
Range | 38.3% | 24.4% |
Mean | 14.2% | 11.0% |
Median | 12.2% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.1% | 12.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Iraqis by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Singapore (11.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kuwait (11.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Russian (11.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Guamanian/Chamorro (11.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Jordanian (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iraqis are New Zealander (11.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Ukrainian (11.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Icelander (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.7%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
Syrians | 91.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Jordanians | 90.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 90.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 90.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Chickasaw | 90.2 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Russians | 89.9 /100 | #106 | Excellent 11.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 89.4 /100 | #107 | Excellent 11.7% |
Turks | 89.4 /100 | #108 | Excellent 11.7% |
South Africans | 89.3 /100 | #109 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 88.7 /100 | #110 | Excellent 11.7% |
Burmese | 88.7 /100 | #111 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 88.4 /100 | #112 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 87.0 /100 | #113 | Excellent 11.7% |
Ukrainians | 86.9 /100 | #114 | Excellent 11.7% |
New Zealanders | 86.3 /100 | #115 | Excellent 11.7% |
Iraqis | 86.3 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
Icelanders | 85.7 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 85.5 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 84.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.8% |