Celtic vs Immigrants from Chile Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Celtic
Immigrants from Chile
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Celtics
Immigrants from Chile
16.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
40.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
74.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Immigrants from Chile Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,451,982 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133 and weighted average of 16.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,959,929 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.536 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 4.2%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Celtic | Immigrants from Chile |
Minimum | 2.2% | 0.79% |
Maximum | 53.6% | 68.4% |
Range | 51.4% | 67.6% |
Mean | 23.0% | 20.7% |
Median | 18.8% | 15.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.8% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.9% | 23.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.0% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 18.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.7% | 17.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Western Asia (16.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Kenyan (16.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Hmong (16.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Lebanese (16.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (16.7%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Ethiopians | 47.8 /100 | #177 | Average 16.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 47.5 /100 | #178 | Average 16.5% |
Hungarians | 47.3 /100 | #179 | Average 16.5% |
Hawaiians | 45.5 /100 | #180 | Average 16.5% |
South American Indians | 44.3 /100 | #181 | Average 16.5% |
Lebanese | 43.3 /100 | #182 | Average 16.6% |
Kenyans | 41.0 /100 | #183 | Average 16.6% |
Celtics | 40.6 /100 | #184 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 40.4 /100 | #185 | Average 16.6% |
Hmong | 38.4 /100 | #186 | Fair 16.6% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 37.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 16.7% |
Immigrants | South America | 37.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.7% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 34.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.7% |
Arabs | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Yugoslavian (15.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nepal (15.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Israeli (15.9%, a difference of 0.27%), French Canadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 79.5 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
French | 78.7 /100 | #153 | Good 15.8% |
Syrians | 77.5 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
French Canadians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Israelis | 76.5 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Yugoslavians | 75.9 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 74.8 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.3 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 69.6 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Costa Ricans | 68.1 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 67.9 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Colombians | 65.2 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 63.6 /100 | #166 | Good 16.2% |