Dominican vs Immigrants from Chile Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Dominican
Immigrants from Chile
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Dominicans
Immigrants from Chile
24.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
74.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dominican vs Immigrants from Chile Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 349,767,755 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Dominicans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.354 and weighted average of 24.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,959,929 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.536 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 51.7%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Dominican | Immigrants from Chile |
Minimum | 10.2% | 0.79% |
Maximum | 71.1% | 68.4% |
Range | 60.8% | 67.6% |
Mean | 27.6% | 20.7% |
Median | 24.8% | 15.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.0% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.2% | 23.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.2% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 18.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.0% | 17.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Dominicans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Dominicans are Colville (24.1%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (24.3%, a difference of 0.59%), Native/Alaskan (24.0%, a difference of 0.92%), Apache (24.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and Black/African American (24.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 22.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.8% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 22.8% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.5% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 24.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 24.1% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 24.2% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.3% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Yugoslavian (15.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nepal (15.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Israeli (15.9%, a difference of 0.27%), French Canadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 79.5 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
French | 78.7 /100 | #153 | Good 15.8% |
Syrians | 77.5 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
French Canadians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Israelis | 76.5 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Yugoslavians | 75.9 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 74.8 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.3 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 69.6 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Costa Ricans | 68.1 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 67.9 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Colombians | 65.2 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 63.6 /100 | #166 | Good 16.2% |