Aleut vs Immigrants from Chile Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Aleut
Immigrants from Chile
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Aleuts
Immigrants from Chile
17.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
6.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
74.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Immigrants from Chile Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,373,672 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512 and weighted average of 17.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,959,929 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.536 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 10.8%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Aleut | Immigrants from Chile |
Minimum | 4.2% | 0.79% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 68.4% |
Range | 95.8% | 67.6% |
Mean | 31.1% | 20.7% |
Median | 20.0% | 15.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.3% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.3% | 23.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.0% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.7% | 18.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.2% | 17.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Aleuts by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Immigrants (17.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Armenia (17.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (17.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Panamanian (17.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Alaskan Athabascan (17.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Portugal | 11.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
German Russians | 10.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 8.2 /100 | #207 | Tragic 17.5% |
Malaysians | 7.6 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 7.3 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 6.8 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 6.7 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.6% |
Aleuts | 6.6 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.7% |
Panamanians | 5.9 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.7% |
Osage | 5.8 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.7% |
Moroccans | 5.6 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.7% |
Japanese | 5.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.7% |
Iraqis | 5.5 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 5.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Yugoslavian (15.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nepal (15.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Israeli (15.9%, a difference of 0.27%), French Canadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 79.5 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
French | 78.7 /100 | #153 | Good 15.8% |
Syrians | 77.5 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
French Canadians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Israelis | 76.5 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Yugoslavians | 75.9 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 74.8 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.3 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 69.6 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Costa Ricans | 68.1 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 67.9 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Colombians | 65.2 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 63.6 /100 | #166 | Good 16.2% |