Carpatho Rusyn vs Scandinavian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
Scandinavian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Scandinavians
7.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Carpatho Rusyn vs Scandinavian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,816,515 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.014 and weighted average of 7.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,471,633 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.557 and weighted average of 7.6%, a difference of 0.96%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Carpatho Rusyn | Scandinavian |
Minimum | 0.31% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 16.9% | 50.0% |
Range | 16.6% | 47.3% |
Mean | 6.5% | 13.3% |
Median | 5.9% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 16.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns and Scandinavians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Slovene (7.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Bolivian (7.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Estonian (7.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Australia (7.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Turkish (7.5%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Immigrants from Austria (7.6%, a difference of 0.24%), German (7.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Australia (7.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Okinawan (7.7%, a difference of 0.65%), and Tongan (7.7%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Bolivians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Slovenes | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Scandinavians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Germans | 99.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Okinawans | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Tongans | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 7.7% |