Carpatho Rusyn vs Immigrants from Austria Family Poverty
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
Immigrants from Austria
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Immigrants from Austria
7.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Carpatho Rusyn vs Immigrants from Austria Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,816,515 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.014 and weighted average of 7.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,754,432 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Austria and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.373 and weighted average of 7.6%, a difference of 1.2%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Carpatho Rusyn | Immigrants from Austria |
Minimum | 0.31% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 16.9% | 15.3% |
Range | 16.6% | 13.9% |
Mean | 6.5% | 6.9% |
Median | 5.9% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 8.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns and Immigrants from Austria by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Slovene (7.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Bolivian (7.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Estonian (7.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Australia (7.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Turkish (7.5%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Austria are Scandinavian (7.6%, a difference of 0.24%), German (7.7%, a difference of 0.29%), Okinawan (7.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Tongan (7.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (7.7%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Bolivians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Slovenes | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Scandinavians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Germans | 99.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Okinawans | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Tongans | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 98.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 7.7% |