Cape Verdean vs Nicaraguan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Cape Verdean
Nicaraguan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Cape Verdeans
Nicaraguans
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cape Verdean vs Nicaraguan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,439,266 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,444,498 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 2.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cape Verdean | Nicaraguan |
| Minimum | 0.95% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 31.5% | 31.8% |
| Range | 30.5% | 28.5% |
| Mean | 10.5% | 11.2% |
| Median | 9.9% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Cape Verdeans and Nicaraguans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Spanish American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Cuban (10.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Liberian (10.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Cherokee (10.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and Iroquois (10.7%, a difference of 0.86%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |