Cape Verdean vs Immigrants from Liberia Family Poverty
COMPARE
Cape Verdean
Immigrants from Liberia
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Cape Verdeans
Immigrants from Liberia
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cape Verdean vs Immigrants from Liberia Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,439,266 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,184,573 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.585 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 1.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cape Verdean | Immigrants from Liberia |
| Minimum | 0.95% | 3.1% |
| Maximum | 31.5% | 40.1% |
| Range | 30.5% | 37.0% |
| Mean | 10.5% | 11.9% |
| Median | 9.9% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Cape Verdeans and Immigrants from Liberia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Spanish American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Ecuadorian (10.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
| Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |