Cape Verdean vs Bangladeshi Family Poverty
COMPARE
Cape Verdean
Bangladeshi
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Cape Verdeans
Bangladeshis
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cape Verdean vs Bangladeshi Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,439,266 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,248,982 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.43%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cape Verdean | Bangladeshi |
Minimum | 0.95% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 31.5% | 28.0% |
Range | 30.5% | 25.9% |
Mean | 10.5% | 11.3% |
Median | 9.9% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 14.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Cape Verdeans and Bangladeshis by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Spanish American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Spanish American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |