Cape Verdean vs Indian (Asian) Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Cape Verdean
Indian (Asian)
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Cape Verdeans
Indians (Asian)
5.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
30.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
192nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
93.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cape Verdean vs Indian (Asian) Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,147,993 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.417 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 487,935,416 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 10.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cape Verdean | Indian (Asian) |
Minimum | 0.66% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 22.2% | 16.6% |
Range | 21.5% | 14.9% |
Mean | 6.0% | 5.3% |
Median | 4.8% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 3.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.9% | 6.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 2.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Cape Verdeans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Immigrants from Cabo Verde (5.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Ugandan (5.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Malaysian (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), South American Indian (5.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Israeli (5.3%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Americans | 35.4 /100 | #185 | Fair 5.3% |
Hungarians | 34.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 33.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 5.3% |
Israelis | 33.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 5.3% |
South American Indians | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 5.3% |
Ugandans | 31.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 30.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 30.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.3% |
Malaysians | 29.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 27.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 27.5 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.4% |
Spaniards | 27.4 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.4% |
Liberians | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are White/Caucasian (4.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Jordanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (4.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Romanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.8%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Celtics | 94.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Kenyans | 94.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 93.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Jordanians | 93.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Romanians | 92.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 92.5 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 92.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Egyptians | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Palestinians | 91.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 4.9% |