Burmese vs Filipino Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Burmese
Filipino
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Burmese
Filipinos
12.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Filipino Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,540,919 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.212 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,527,529 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 15.0%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Filipino |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.84% |
| Maximum | 36.7% | 26.4% |
| Range | 35.4% | 25.5% |
| Mean | 10.7% | 8.4% |
| Median | 9.1% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Filipinos by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Lithuania (12.9%, a difference of 0.84%), Immigrants from Ireland (12.7%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Korea (13.0%, a difference of 1.1%), Norwegian (13.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and Bulgarian (13.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Taiwan (11.0%, a difference of 0.85%), Immigrants from India (10.8%, a difference of 3.4%), Thai (11.6%, a difference of 3.9%), Chinese (11.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.1%, a difference of 9.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.1% |