Burmese vs Filipino Male Poverty
COMPARE
Burmese
Filipino
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Burmese
Filipinos
9.7%
MALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.2%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Filipino Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,653,022 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,097,817 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.086 and weighted average of 9.2%, a difference of 5.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Filipino |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.38% |
| Maximum | 23.5% | 18.4% |
| Range | 22.2% | 18.0% |
| Mean | 8.2% | 7.3% |
| Median | 8.0% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.0% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Filipinos by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Danish (9.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Eastern European (9.6%, a difference of 0.44%), Swedish (9.6%, a difference of 0.58%), Italian (9.6%, a difference of 0.66%), and Croatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Ireland (9.1%, a difference of 0.67%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (9.3%, a difference of 0.79%), Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |