Burmese vs Maltese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Burmese
Maltese
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Burmese
Maltese
12.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Maltese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,540,919 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.212 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,710,734 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 2.6%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Maltese |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.98% |
| Maximum | 36.7% | 54.9% |
| Range | 35.4% | 53.9% |
| Mean | 10.7% | 14.4% |
| Median | 9.1% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 17.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 8.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 10.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 9.9% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Maltese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Lithuania (12.9%, a difference of 0.84%), Immigrants from Ireland (12.7%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Korea (13.0%, a difference of 1.1%), Norwegian (13.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and Bulgarian (13.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Indian (Asian) (13.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Okinawan (13.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Latvian (13.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Eastern European (13.2%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.3% |