Maltese vs Filipino Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Maltese
Filipino
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Maltese
Filipinos
13.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Filipino Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,710,734 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,527,529 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 18.0%.

Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Maltese | Filipino |
Minimum | 0.98% | 0.84% |
Maximum | 54.9% | 26.4% |
Range | 53.9% | 25.5% |
Mean | 14.4% | 8.4% |
Median | 12.6% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.1% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Maltese and Filipinos by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Okinawan (13.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Japan (13.0%, a difference of 0.70%), Cypriot (13.0%, a difference of 0.74%), and Bulgarian (13.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Taiwan (11.0%, a difference of 0.85%), Thai (11.6%, a difference of 3.9%), Chinese (11.9%, a difference of 7.1%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and Iranian (12.2%, a difference of 9.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.1% |