Chinese vs Filipino Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Chinese
Filipino
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Chinese
Filipinos
11.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Filipino Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,759,689 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.266 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,527,529 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 7.1%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Filipino |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 0.84% |
| Maximum | 56.0% | 26.4% |
| Range | 53.7% | 25.5% |
| Mean | 14.3% | 8.4% |
| Median | 11.6% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.5% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Filipinos by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.1%, a difference of 1.8%), Iranian (12.2%, a difference of 2.6%), Thai (11.6%, a difference of 3.1%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and Immigrants from Iran (12.4%, a difference of 3.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Taiwan (11.0%, a difference of 0.85%), Immigrants from India (10.8%, a difference of 3.4%), Thai (11.6%, a difference of 3.9%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and Iranian (12.2%, a difference of 9.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.1% |