Brazilian vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Brazilian
Chinese
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Comparison
Brazilians
Chinese
80.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
80.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,965,381 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.104 and weighted average of 80.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,809,125 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.452 and weighted average of 80.7%, a difference of 0.15%.
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 57.6% | 51.7% |
| Maximum | 92.6% | 86.2% |
| Range | 35.0% | 34.5% |
| Mean | 80.3% | 79.0% |
| Median | 80.8% | 80.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 79.3% | 77.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.2% | 83.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Chinese by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (80.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Ugandan (80.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Liberia (80.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Paraguayan (80.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Moldova (80.6%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Brazil (80.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ireland (80.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lithuania (80.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Poland (80.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (80.7%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 80.8% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Chinese | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 80.6% |
| Paraguayans | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 80.6% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 80.6% |
| Ugandans | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 80.6% |
| Brazilians | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Czechs | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Slovenes | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.6 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 80.5% |