Black/African American vs Immigrants from Jordan Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Black/African American
Immigrants from Jordan
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Blacks/African Americans
Immigrants from Jordan
16.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Black/African American vs Immigrants from Jordan Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,674,082 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Blacks/African Americans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.670 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,036,341 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.733 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 29.7%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Black/African American | Immigrants from Jordan |
| Minimum | 11.9% | 6.0% |
| Maximum | 42.4% | 100.0% |
| Range | 30.6% | 94.0% |
| Mean | 18.3% | 16.7% |
| Median | 17.2% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.2% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 14.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 14.3% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Blacks/African Americans by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Blacks/African Americans are Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.34%), Cheyenne (16.1%, a difference of 0.48%), Alaskan Athabascan (16.1%, a difference of 0.53%), Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and Cherokee (16.1%, a difference of 0.82%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Russian (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Kenya (12.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Serbian (12.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Netherlands (12.5%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Venezuelans | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 12.4% |
| Icelanders | 88.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Serbians | 87.9 /100 | #122 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 87.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Russians | 87.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 87.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Romanians | 86.4 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 86.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 85.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 85.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 84.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 83.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Salvadorans | 83.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.5% |