Black/African American vs Immigrants from Chile Female Poverty
COMPARE
Black/African American
Immigrants from Chile
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Blacks/African Americans
Immigrants from Chile
18.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
57.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Black/African American vs Immigrants from Chile Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 564,914,608 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Blacks/African Americans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824 and weighted average of 18.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,592,418 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 39.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Black/African American | Immigrants from Chile |
| Minimum | 11.4% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 45.5% | 23.0% |
| Range | 34.1% | 20.6% |
| Mean | 21.2% | 11.6% |
| Median | 21.0% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.9% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.2% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Blacks/African Americans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Blacks/African Americans are Kiowa (18.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Dominican (19.1%, a difference of 2.9%), Yakama (18.0%, a difference of 3.0%), Central American Indian (18.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and Native/Alaskan (19.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Oceania (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and White/Caucasian (13.4%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |