Bhutanese vs Chinese Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Chinese
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Bhutanese
Chinese
11.4%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Chinese Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,147,907 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.138 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,632,292 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.121 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 4.4%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Chinese |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 33.8% | 25.7% |
| Range | 31.9% | 23.7% |
| Mean | 11.5% | 11.2% |
| Median | 9.9% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Chinese by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Tongan (11.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Maltese (11.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Bolivian (11.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Asian (11.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Turkish (11.4%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Iran (11.0%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Singapore (11.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.1%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Korea (11.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and Immigrants from Ireland (11.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Asians | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.5% |