Bhutanese vs Icelander Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Icelander
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Bhutanese
Icelanders
15.0%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.5%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Icelander Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 350,288,163 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 15.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,441,299 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.793 and weighted average of 14.5%, a difference of 3.0%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Icelander |
| Minimum | 0.92% | 7.7% |
| Maximum | 84.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 83.3% | 92.3% |
| Mean | 17.6% | 43.2% |
| Median | 14.7% | 19.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.8% | 80.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.3% | 67.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.1% | 36.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.0% | 34.9% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Icelanders by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (15.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from China (14.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Malaysian (14.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cambodia (14.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Somalia (14.9%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Thai (14.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Asian (14.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Okinawan (14.6%, a difference of 0.71%), Egyptian (14.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (14.7%, a difference of 0.88%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Icelanders | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Egyptians | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Pima | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 15.0% |