Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,467,619 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,657,809 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.692 and weighted average of 16.0%, a difference of 24.8%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Bangladeshi	Immigrants from Northern Africa
Minimum	0.72%	6.2%
Maximum	54.5%	78.6%
Range	53.8%	72.3%
Mean	22.6%	22.9%
Median	20.7%	16.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	14.7%	12.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	29.3%	24.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	14.6%	11.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.2%	16.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.1%	16.7%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Immigrants from El Salvador (20.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Barbados (19.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Cherokee (19.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (20.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Subsaharan African (20.1%, a difference of 0.57%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Spanish Americans	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.9%
Spanish American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 19.9%
Liberians	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 19.9%
Cherokee	0.1 /100 \| #270	Tragic 19.9%
Immigrants \| Barbados	0.1 /100 \| #271	Tragic 19.9%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	0.1 /100 \| #272	Tragic 20.0%
Bangladeshis	0.1 /100 \| #273	Tragic 20.0%
Immigrants \| St. Vincent and the Grenadines	0.0 /100 \| #274	Tragic 20.1%
Sub-Saharan Africans	0.0 /100 \| #275	Tragic 20.1%
Comanche	0.0 /100 \| #276	Tragic 20.2%
Belizeans	0.0 /100 \| #277	Tragic 20.2%
Barbadians	0.0 /100 \| #278	Tragic 20.2%
Immigrants \| Zaire	0.0 /100 \| #279	Tragic 20.2%
Immigrants \| Liberia	0.0 /100 \| #280	Tragic 20.2%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are French (16.0%, a difference of 0.11%), French Canadian (16.1%, a difference of 0.47%), Slovak (15.9%, a difference of 0.49%), Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Oceania (16.1%, a difference of 0.52%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Chile	76.7 /100 \| #154	Good 15.9%
Syrians	76.7 /100 \| #155	Good 15.9%
Immigrants \| Fiji	76.1 /100 \| #156	Good 15.9%
Colombians	76.1 /100 \| #157	Good 15.9%
Guamanians/Chamorros	75.3 /100 \| #158	Good 15.9%
Slovaks	75.2 /100 \| #159	Good 15.9%
French	72.8 /100 \| #160	Good 16.0%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	72.0 /100 \| #161	Good 16.0%
French Canadians	68.7 /100 \| #162	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Oceania	68.4 /100 \| #163	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Colombia	67.8 /100 \| #164	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Germany	67.3 /100 \| #165	Good 16.1%
South Americans	67.2 /100 \| #166	Good 16.1%
Uruguayans	64.7 /100 \| #167	Good 16.2%
Yugoslavians	64.4 /100 \| #168	Good 16.2%