Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Yup'ik
Immigrants from Northern Africa
25.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
72.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,851,220 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.305 and weighted average of 25.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,657,809 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.692 and weighted average of 16.0%, a difference of 61.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yup'ik | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| Minimum | 7.1% | 6.2% |
| Maximum | 75.0% | 78.6% |
| Range | 67.9% | 72.3% |
| Mean | 30.5% | 22.9% |
| Median | 25.0% | 16.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.1% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 43.9% | 24.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 27.8% | 11.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.4% | 16.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.3% | 16.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Sioux (25.6%, a difference of 0.93%), Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 1.8%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 2.1%), Pueblo (25.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and Menominee (25.0%, a difference of 3.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are French (16.0%, a difference of 0.11%), French Canadian (16.1%, a difference of 0.47%), Slovak (15.9%, a difference of 0.49%), Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Oceania (16.1%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
| Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
| Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
| Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
| French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
| French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
| South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
| Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |