Austrian vs Immigrants from Chile Child Poverty Under the Age of 5

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 426,879,815 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.499 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,144,685 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.129 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 1.9%.

Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Austrian	Immigrants from Chile
Minimum	7.7%	2.3%
Maximum	100.0%	34.3%
Range	92.3%	32.0%
Mean	32.1%	16.5%
Median	20.8%	15.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	12.8%	14.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	44.1%	19.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	31.3%	5.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	27.3%	7.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	26.8%	6.8%

Demographics Similar to Austrians and Immigrants from Chile by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5

In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Austrians are Swiss (16.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (16.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Native Hawaiian (16.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Albania (16.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from England (16.2%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are German (16.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Hungary (16.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Guamanian/Chamorro (16.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (16.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and Brazilian (16.4%, a difference of 0.58%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Immigrants \| Peru	92.6 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 16.1%
Mongolians	92.5 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 16.1%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	92.0 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 16.1%
Austrians	92.0 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 16.1%
Swiss	92.0 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 16.1%
Native Hawaiians	91.8 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 16.2%
Immigrants \| Albania	91.8 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 16.2%
Immigrants \| England	91.5 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 16.2%
South Africans	90.1 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 16.2%
British	89.4 /100 \| #129	Excellent 16.3%
Immigrants \| Norway	89.3 /100 \| #130	Excellent 16.3%
Finns	88.3 /100 \| #131	Excellent 16.3%
Serbians	88.2 /100 \| #132	Excellent 16.3%
Icelanders	87.9 /100 \| #133	Excellent 16.3%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	87.8 /100 \| #134	Excellent 16.4%
Brazilians	87.8 /100 \| #135	Excellent 16.4%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	87.5 /100 \| #136	Excellent 16.4%
Immigrants \| Chile	85.3 /100 \| #137	Excellent 16.4%
Germans	84.8 /100 \| #138	Excellent 16.5%
Immigrants \| Hungary	84.5 /100 \| #139	Excellent 16.5%
Guamanians/Chamorros	84.2 /100 \| #140	Excellent 16.5%