Australian vs Taiwanese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Australian
Taiwanese
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Australians
Taiwanese
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Taiwanese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,150,197 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.510 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,593,485 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 1.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Australian | Taiwanese |
Minimum | 5.3% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 60.2% | 36.8% |
Range | 54.9% | 35.2% |
Mean | 19.5% | 14.2% |
Median | 15.3% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.4% | 18.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.7% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Australians and Taiwanese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Swiss (14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Soviet Union (14.8%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Immigrants from Austria (14.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (14.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Netherlands (14.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Slovene (14.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and European (14.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Europeans | 98.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Slovenes | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Taiwanese | 98.0 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 97.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 97.9 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Argentineans | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |