Australian vs Choctaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Australian
Choctaw
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Australians
Choctaw
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Choctaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,150,197 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.510 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,369,694 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445 and weighted average of 21.1%, a difference of 42.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Australian | Choctaw |
Minimum | 5.3% | 5.3% |
Maximum | 60.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 54.9% | 94.7% |
Mean | 19.5% | 33.5% |
Median | 15.3% | 26.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 21.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.4% | 33.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.7% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 21.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 21.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Australians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Swiss (14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Soviet Union (14.8%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 96.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Seminole (21.2%, a difference of 0.12%), British West Indian (21.3%, a difference of 0.57%), Indonesian (21.3%, a difference of 0.60%), Somali (21.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and Hispanic or Latino (21.0%, a difference of 0.93%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 20.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 20.8% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 20.9% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.0% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |