Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Cuban Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac
Cuban
Single Mother Poverty
Single Mother Poverty Comparison
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs
Cubans
23.8%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.6%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
20.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Cuban Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,112,991 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 23.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 437,360,929 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.129 and weighted average of 29.6%, a difference of 24.5%.

Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac | Cuban |
| Minimum | 3.1% | 8.7% |
| Maximum | 50.9% | 59.8% |
| Range | 47.8% | 51.1% |
| Mean | 22.0% | 29.3% |
| Median | 22.1% | 29.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.2% | 24.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.5% | 32.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 8.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Mother Poverty
Demographics Similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs are Immigrants from India (23.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Taiwan (23.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Filipino (24.3%, a difference of 2.1%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (24.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and Thai (24.5%, a difference of 2.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 23.8% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 23.8% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 23.9% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 24.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 24.4% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 24.5% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 24.6% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 25.1% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 25.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 25.3% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 25.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 25.6% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 25.8% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 25.8% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 25.8% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Panamanian (29.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (29.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Jamaica (29.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Belgian (29.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and Spanish American Indian (29.6%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
| Moroccans | 28.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 29.5% |
| Basques | 28.3 /100 | #193 | Fair 29.5% |
| Icelanders | 26.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 29.5% |
| Slavs | 24.5 /100 | #195 | Fair 29.6% |
| Spanish American Indians | 23.4 /100 | #196 | Fair 29.6% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 22.0 /100 | #197 | Fair 29.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 21.7 /100 | #198 | Fair 29.6% |
| Cubans | 20.8 /100 | #199 | Fair 29.6% |
| Panamanians | 20.0 /100 | #200 | Fair 29.6% |
| Belgians | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 29.7% |
| Malaysians | 17.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 29.7% |
| Swiss | 17.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 29.7% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 16.6 /100 | #204 | Poor 29.7% |
| Czechoslovakians | 16.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 29.7% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 15.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 29.7% |