Argentinean vs Jamaican Female Poverty
COMPARE
Argentinean
 Jamaican
 Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Argentineans
Jamaicans
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Argentinean vs Jamaican Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,942,880 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.270 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,594,174 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064 and weighted average of 15.5%, a difference of 21.7%.
 
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Argentinean | Jamaican | 
| Minimum | 1.6% | 5.3% | 
| Maximum | 23.9% | 29.8% | 
| Range | 22.4% | 24.5% | 
| Mean | 10.5% | 15.4% | 
| Median | 10.2% | 15.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 12.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 17.3% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 4.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 4.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 4.5% | 
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Argentineans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), South African (12.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Belarus (12.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty | 
| Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% | 
| Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% | 
| New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% | 
| Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% | 
| French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% | 
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% | 
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% | 
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% | 
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% | 
| South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% | 
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% | 
| Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% | 
| Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% | 
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty | 
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% | 
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% | 
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% | 
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% | 
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% | 
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% | 
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% | 
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% | 
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% | 
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% | 
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% | 
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% | 
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% | 
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% | 
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |