Argentinean vs Brazilian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Argentinean
Brazilian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Argentineans
Brazilians
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
80.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Argentinean vs Brazilian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,942,880 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.270 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,667,111 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 1.7%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Argentinean | Brazilian |
Minimum | 1.6% | 0.74% |
Maximum | 23.9% | 30.6% |
Range | 22.4% | 29.9% |
Mean | 10.5% | 12.5% |
Median | 10.2% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 14.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Argentineans and Brazilians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), South African (12.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Belarus (12.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.42%), Basque (12.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |