American vs Cherokee Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
American
Cherokee
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Americans
Cherokee
15.8%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
American vs Cherokee Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 478,139,646 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Americans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.617 and weighted average of 15.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 428,758,235 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 1.6%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | American | Cherokee |
Minimum | 9.7% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 90.3% | 95.7% |
Mean | 34.5% | 27.7% |
Median | 25.4% | 22.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.2% | 15.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.5% | 30.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.3% | 15.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.3% | 18.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.2% | 18.4% |
Demographics Similar to Americans and Cherokee by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Americans are Potawatomi (15.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Ute (15.7%, a difference of 0.73%), Yakama (15.9%, a difference of 0.87%), Seminole (16.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and Comanche (16.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Seminole (16.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Comanche (16.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Alaskan Athabascan (16.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Cheyenne (16.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 15.2% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 15.2% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 15.4% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |