Tsimshian vs Cherokee Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Cherokee
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Tsimshian
Cherokee
11.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Cherokee Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,184,225 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 428,758,235 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 44.9%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 0.66% | 4.3% |
| Maximum | 35.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 34.3% | 95.7% |
| Mean | 14.1% | 27.7% |
| Median | 11.2% | 22.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.6% | 30.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.2% | 15.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.7% | 18.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 18.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Bhutanese (11.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Moldova (11.2%, a difference of 0.72%), Ethiopian (11.2%, a difference of 0.74%), and Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Seminole (16.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Comanche (16.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Alaskan Athabascan (16.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Cheyenne (16.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |