Immigrants from Malaysia vs Cherokee Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Cherokee
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Cherokee
12.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
77th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Cherokee Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,302,457 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.707 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 428,758,235 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 34.1%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Cherokee |
Minimum | 7.3% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 92.7% | 95.7% |
Mean | 18.6% | 27.7% |
Median | 12.3% | 22.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 15.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.8% | 30.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 15.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.8% | 18.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.6% | 18.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Immigrants from Venezuela (12.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (11.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Uruguayan (11.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Belgium (12.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and Chilean (11.9%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Argentineans | 99.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Chileans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Uruguayans | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Armenians | 98.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | South America | 98.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Seminole (16.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Comanche (16.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Alaskan Athabascan (16.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Cheyenne (16.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |