Yakama vs Zimbabwean In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Yakama
Zimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Yakama
Zimbabweans
79.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Zimbabwean In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,914,552 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Yakama and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.302 and weighted average of 79.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,193,973 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 85.6%, a difference of 8.2%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 43.8% | 50.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 56.2% | 50.0% |
Mean | 79.0% | 86.8% |
Median | 81.1% | 86.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 69.8% | 84.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 85.6% | 91.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.8% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.5% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 8.0% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Yakama by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Pima (79.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Hopi (79.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Lithuania (85.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Italy (85.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Turkish (85.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (85.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Nepal (85.6%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Serbians | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Albanians | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Zimbabweans | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 85.6% |