Filipino vs Pima In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Filipino
Pima
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Filipinos
Pima
85.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
79.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Pima In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,232,337 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 85.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,528,436 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 79.0%, a difference of 8.2%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Filipino | Pima |
| Minimum | 64.5% | 46.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 35.5% | 53.6% |
| Mean | 86.5% | 79.8% |
| Median | 85.9% | 81.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 84.1% | 71.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 88.9% | 95.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 23.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 16.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 15.9% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Filipinos by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Kenya (85.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (85.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Czech (85.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Russian (85.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Polish (85.5%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Slovenes | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Filipinos | 99.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 99.6 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.6 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Poles | 99.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 85.5% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Ute (78.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |