Croatian vs Pima In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Croatian
Pima
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Croatians
Pima
85.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
79.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs Pima In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,472,504 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Croatians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.450 and weighted average of 85.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,528,436 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 79.0%, a difference of 8.3%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Croatian | Pima |
| Minimum | 22.2% | 46.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 77.8% | 53.6% |
| Mean | 84.1% | 79.8% |
| Median | 86.9% | 81.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 83.7% | 71.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 92.8% | 95.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 23.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.7% | 16.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.6% | 15.9% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Croatians by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Immigrants from Morocco (85.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (85.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (85.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sweden (85.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and Lithuanian (85.6%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 85.7% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 85.7% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Slovenes | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Filipinos | 99.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 99.6 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 85.5% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Ute (78.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |