Yakama vs Immigrants from Mexico In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Yakama
Immigrants from Mexico
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Yakama
Immigrants from Mexico
79.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Immigrants from Mexico In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,917,241 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Yakama and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.383 and weighted average of 79.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,440,276 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 81.5%, a difference of 3.2%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama | Immigrants from Mexico |
Minimum | 44.1% | 54.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 55.9% | 46.0% |
Mean | 77.9% | 80.4% |
Median | 80.1% | 80.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 66.7% | 77.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 85.7% | 83.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.0% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Immigrants from Mexico by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Kiowa (79.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Ute (79.4%, a difference of 0.62%), Houma (79.5%, a difference of 0.68%), Cheyenne (79.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and Menominee (79.7%, a difference of 0.90%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Cajun (81.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Comanche (81.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Cherokee (81.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Alaskan Athabascan (81.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Inupiat (80.9%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.5% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 80.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 80.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 80.7% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 80.6% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 80.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 80.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 80.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.0% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 79.7% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 79.5% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.0% |