Houma vs Slavic In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Houma
 Slavic
 In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Houma
Slavs
79.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Slavic In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,791,353 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Houma and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 79.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,763,521 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Slavs and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070 and weighted average of 85.0%, a difference of 6.4%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Houma | Slavic | 
| Minimum | 40.7% | 40.0% | 
| Maximum | 93.9% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 53.2% | 60.0% | 
| Mean | 76.8% | 85.2% | 
| Median | 79.3% | 87.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 71.1% | 82.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 86.1% | 100.0% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.0% | 17.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.3% | 16.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.1% | 16.1% | 
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Houma by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Kiowa (79.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Pueblo (80.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Inupiat (79.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Sioux (80.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and Creek (80.4%, a difference of 0.58%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #324  | Tragic 81.1%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 81.0%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 80.8%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 80.7%  | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 80.4%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 80.4%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 80.0%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 79.9%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 79.8%  | 
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 79.7%  | 
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 79.3%  | 
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 79.2%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 79.2%  | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 79.1%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 79.0%  | 
Demographics Similar to Slavs by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Austrian (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Western Africa (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Spain (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Jordan (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | 
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.3 /100 | #120  | Exceptional 85.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Egypt | 93.2 /100 | #121  | Exceptional 85.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 92.6 /100 | #122  | Exceptional 85.1%  | 
| Armenians | 92.2 /100 | #123  | Exceptional 85.0%  | 
| Australians | 92.0 /100 | #124  | Exceptional 85.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Jordan | 91.5 /100 | #125  | Exceptional 85.0%  | 
| Austrians | 90.9 /100 | #126  | Exceptional 85.0%  | 
| Slavs | 90.7 /100 | #127  | Exceptional 85.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Argentina | 90.6 /100 | #128  | Exceptional 85.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 90.2 /100 | #129  | Exceptional 85.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Spain | 90.0 /100 | #130  | Exceptional 85.0%  | 
| Chinese | 89.6 /100 | #131  | Excellent 85.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Israel | 89.5 /100 | #132  | Excellent 85.0%  | 
| New Zealanders | 89.5 /100 | #133  | Excellent 85.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.2 /100 | #134  | Excellent 85.0%  |