Cherokee vs Slavic In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Cherokee
Slavic
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Cherokee
Slavs
81.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Slavic In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,185,438 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.100 and weighted average of 81.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,763,521 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Slavs and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070 and weighted average of 85.0%, a difference of 4.2%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cherokee | Slavic |
Minimum | 44.6% | 40.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 55.4% | 60.0% |
Mean | 78.0% | 85.2% |
Median | 79.0% | 87.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 71.7% | 82.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.3% | 100.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.6% | 17.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 16.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.0% | 16.1% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Alaskan Athabascan (81.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from the Azores (81.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Arapaho (81.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Choctaw (81.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Shoshone (81.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 82.1% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 82.0% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 82.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 81.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 81.9% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 81.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.7% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.6% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.4% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 81.4% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 81.4% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 81.3% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 81.2% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Austrian (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Western Africa (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Spain (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Jordan (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Armenians | 92.2 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Australians | 92.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 91.5 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Austrians | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Slavs | 90.7 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 90.2 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Chinese | 89.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 85.0% |
Immigrants | Israel | 89.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 85.0% |
New Zealanders | 89.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 85.0% |
Immigrants | Chile | 89.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 85.0% |