Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Austria In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,892,263 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 38.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,731,436 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Austria and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.494 and weighted average of 37.9%, a difference of 1.3%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Subsaharan African	Immigrants from Austria
Minimum	19.0%	16.2%
Maximum	69.1%	100.0%
Range	50.1%	83.8%
Mean	40.9%	46.4%
Median	39.6%	44.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	37.9%	36.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	44.0%	54.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.0%	18.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.7%	15.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.6%	15.4%

Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Immigrants from Austria by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Hawaiian (38.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Scotland (38.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Bulgarian (38.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Colville (38.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and Chickasaw (38.3%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Austria are Immigrants from Oceania (37.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (38.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Spaniard (38.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Choctaw (38.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and New Zealander (38.0%, a difference of 0.15%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Immigrants \| Scotland	98.5 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 38.5%
Sub-Saharan Africans	98.3 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 38.4%
Hawaiians	98.2 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 38.4%
Bulgarians	97.9 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 38.3%
Colville	97.9 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 38.3%
Chickasaw	97.8 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 38.3%
Immigrants \| Nepal	97.8 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 38.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	97.8 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 38.3%
Ukrainians	97.6 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 38.3%
Ethiopians	97.4 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 38.2%
Guamanians/Chamorros	97.4 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 38.2%
Seminole	96.7 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 38.1%
Immigrants \| England	96.4 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 38.1%
Immigrants \| Africa	96.1 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 38.0%
Africans	95.6 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 38.0%
Choctaw	95.6 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 38.0%
New Zealanders	95.6 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 38.0%
Spaniards	95.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 38.0%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	95.4 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 38.0%
Immigrants \| Austria	95.0 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 37.9%
Immigrants \| Oceania	94.7 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 37.9%