Lumbee vs Immigrants from Ecuador In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,241,195 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.256 and weighted average of 31.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,745,839 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.117 and weighted average of 31.0%, a difference of 0.15%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Lumbee	Immigrants from Ecuador
Minimum	8.5%	11.4%
Maximum	100.0%	48.1%
Range	91.5%	36.7%
Mean	34.8%	31.0%
Median	32.7%	31.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	27.5%	24.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	41.7%	35.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	14.2%	11.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	17.4%	9.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	17.2%	9.1%

Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Immigrants from Ecuador by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Barbadian (31.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (30.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Taiwan (31.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (31.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from China (31.1%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Barbadian (31.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Taiwan (31.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (31.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (30.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from China (31.1%, a difference of 0.40%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Soviet Union	0.0 /100 \| #319	Tragic 31.4%
Ecuadorians	0.0 /100 \| #320	Tragic 31.4%
West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #321	Tragic 31.3%
Tohono O'odham	0.0 /100 \| #322	Tragic 31.3%
Immigrants \| Caribbean	0.0 /100 \| #323	Tragic 31.2%
Dominicans	0.0 /100 \| #324	Tragic 31.2%
Immigrants \| China	0.0 /100 \| #325	Tragic 31.1%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #326	Tragic 31.1%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	0.0 /100 \| #327	Tragic 31.0%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.0 /100 \| #328	Tragic 31.0%
Barbadians	0.0 /100 \| #329	Tragic 31.0%
Lumbee	0.0 /100 \| #330	Tragic 31.0%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.0 /100 \| #331	Tragic 30.9%
Immigrants \| Israel	0.0 /100 \| #332	Tragic 30.5%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 30.5%
Puerto Ricans	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 30.3%
Immigrants \| Cuba	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 30.2%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 30.2%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 30.0%
Vietnamese	0.0 /100 \| #338	Tragic 29.6%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	0.0 /100 \| #339	Tragic 29.2%