Lumbee vs Immigrants from Taiwan In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,241,195 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.256 and weighted average of 31.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 297,913,482 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.495 and weighted average of 31.0%, a difference of 0.19%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Lumbee	Immigrants from Taiwan
Minimum	8.5%	2.3%
Maximum	100.0%	52.9%
Range	91.5%	50.6%
Mean	34.8%	26.3%
Median	32.7%	27.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	27.5%	21.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	41.7%	32.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	14.2%	10.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	17.4%	8.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	17.2%	8.2%

Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Immigrants from Taiwan by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Barbadian (31.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ecuador (31.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (30.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (31.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from China (31.1%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Taiwan are Immigrants from Ecuador (31.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Barbadian (31.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (31.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (30.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from China (31.1%, a difference of 0.36%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Immigrants \| Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #318	Tragic 31.5%
Soviet Union	0.0 /100 \| #319	Tragic 31.4%
Ecuadorians	0.0 /100 \| #320	Tragic 31.4%
West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #321	Tragic 31.3%
Tohono O'odham	0.0 /100 \| #322	Tragic 31.3%
Immigrants \| Caribbean	0.0 /100 \| #323	Tragic 31.2%
Dominicans	0.0 /100 \| #324	Tragic 31.2%
Immigrants \| China	0.0 /100 \| #325	Tragic 31.1%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #326	Tragic 31.1%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	0.0 /100 \| #327	Tragic 31.0%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.0 /100 \| #328	Tragic 31.0%
Barbadians	0.0 /100 \| #329	Tragic 31.0%
Lumbee	0.0 /100 \| #330	Tragic 31.0%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.0 /100 \| #331	Tragic 30.9%
Immigrants \| Israel	0.0 /100 \| #332	Tragic 30.5%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 30.5%
Puerto Ricans	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 30.3%
Immigrants \| Cuba	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 30.2%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 30.2%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 30.0%
Vietnamese	0.0 /100 \| #338	Tragic 29.6%