Liberian vs Immigrants from Sierra Leone In Labor Force | Age 35-44

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,044,655 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 85.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,643,562 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sierra Leone and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554 and weighted average of 86.1%, a difference of 0.46%.

In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Liberian	Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Minimum	73.0%	70.5%
Maximum	99.7%	100.0%
Range	26.7%	29.5%
Mean	86.8%	88.2%
Median	86.3%	87.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	83.4%	85.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	91.2%	89.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.8%	4.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.4%	5.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.4%	5.0%

Demographics Similar to Liberians and Immigrants from Sierra Leone by In Labor Force | Age 35-44

In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Somali (85.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Somalia (85.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Norwegian (85.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ireland (85.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (85.6%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone are Bolivian (86.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Zimbabwean (86.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (85.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (86.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Ethiopian (85.9%, a difference of 0.18%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 35-44
Sierra Leoneans	100.0 /100 \| #1	Exceptional 86.4%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #2	Exceptional 86.4%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	100.0 /100 \| #3	Exceptional 86.2%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 86.2%
Zimbabweans	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 86.1%
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 86.1%
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 86.1%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 85.9%
Ethiopians	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 85.9%
Cape Verdeans	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 85.8%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 85.8%
Liberians	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 85.7%
Somalis	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Somalia	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 85.6%
Norwegians	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Ireland	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 85.6%
Carpatho Rusyns	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 85.6%
Slovenes	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Serbia	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 85.5%