Liberian vs Immigrants from Ireland In Labor Force | Age 35-44

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,044,655 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 85.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,753,518 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182 and weighted average of 85.6%, a difference of 0.060%.

In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Liberian	Immigrants from Ireland
Minimum	73.0%	61.5%
Maximum	99.7%	100.0%
Range	26.7%	38.5%
Mean	86.8%	85.5%
Median	86.3%	86.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	83.4%	82.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	91.2%	89.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.8%	6.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.4%	8.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.4%	8.5%

Demographics Similar to Liberians and Immigrants from Ireland by In Labor Force | Age 35-44

In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Somali (85.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Somalia (85.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Norwegian (85.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (85.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Carpatho Rusyn (85.6%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ireland are Norwegian (85.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Somali (85.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Somalia (85.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (85.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Carpatho Rusyn (85.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 35-44
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 86.2%
Zimbabweans	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 86.1%
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 86.1%
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 86.1%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 85.9%
Ethiopians	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 85.9%
Cape Verdeans	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 85.8%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 85.8%
Liberians	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 85.7%
Somalis	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Somalia	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 85.6%
Norwegians	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Ireland	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 85.6%
Carpatho Rusyns	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 85.6%
Slovenes	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Serbia	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 85.5%
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 85.5%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 85.4%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 85.4%
Latvians	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 85.4%