Latvian vs Immigrants from Thailand In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,454,154 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487 and weighted average of 38.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,722,585 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220 and weighted average of 38.7%, a difference of 0.36%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Latvian	Immigrants from Thailand
Minimum	8.4%	15.4%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	91.6%	84.6%
Mean	50.8%	46.3%
Median	41.8%	42.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	37.8%	37.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	59.2%	52.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	21.4%	14.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	23.9%	17.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	23.6%	17.3%

Demographics Similar to Latvians and Immigrants from Thailand by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from North America (38.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Greek (38.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Ugandan (38.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (38.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Canada (38.9%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Hmong (38.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Zimbabwean (38.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cameroon (38.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Eritrea (38.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (38.9%, a difference of 0.29%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Puget Sound Salish	99.6 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 39.1%
Alaska Natives	99.6 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 39.1%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	99.5 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 39.0%
Spanish Americans	99.5 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 39.0%
Osage	99.4 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 39.0%
Blackfeet	99.4 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| Canada	99.4 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| North America	99.4 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 38.9%
Latvians	99.4 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 38.9%
Greeks	99.3 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 38.9%
Ugandans	99.3 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	99.3 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| Thailand	99.1 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 38.7%
Hmong	99.1 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 38.7%
Zimbabweans	99.1 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 38.7%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	99.0 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 38.7%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	99.0 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 38.7%
Iraqis	98.9 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 38.6%
Delaware	98.8 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 38.6%
Chinese	98.8 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 38.6%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	98.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 38.6%